From very early on, Android fans were concerned about the Qualcomm Snapdragon 810. Early rumors didn’t favor the chipset, but then they were just that – rumors. Then the G Flex 2 came out, and surprise-surprise: performance was sub-par. LG was quick to dismiss this as a software issue. The M9 rekindled the doubts when it was shown to overheat during intense benchmarking.
This, too, was dismissed as a software issue, and a firmware revision “fixed” the problem by putting a severe cap on CPU frequencies which directly affected real-world performance. But the story does not stop there…
The main issue we see at XDA is not the Snapdragon 810 itself, but the amount of misinformation surrounding this particular chipset. Another worrisome aspect is the fact that many websites – from Android blogs to business sites – try their best to mitigate these issues, hide them or dismiss them. The biggest problem comes when said sites take comments at face-value, like those of VP of Marketing Tim McDonough who adamantly defended the chip from criticism. As a marketer, that is his job. Our job at the XDA Portal is putting things into context to inform our users, and find the real truth in the process every now and then. We dismantled McDonough’s arguments and refuted them, but sadly the blogosphere at large didn’t do the same.
Now, the Snapdragon 810 publicly appeared again, this time in the allegedly “fixed” Mi Note Pro. Was the dragon really tamed? One would think it is too early to say (and it certainly is to conclude), but early reports paint a rather grim picture of the situation. Users in social media and the Xiaomi forums are claiming all sorts of incidents related to heat: high temperatures while charging and gaming, faulty displays and there are even mentions of components that simply stop functioning for good. Xiaomi investigated some of these issues and even replaced a particularly controversial unit. They contacted Gizmochina and said the following:
1. On May 13, we’ve given the user a new Mi Note Pro and he has expressed satisfaction with the replacement.
2. The technicians that first encountered the faulty unit have verified that the mainboard was NOT burnt.
3. The unit is currently in transit to Xiaomi’s Beijing office where our engineers will investigate why it cannot be turned on.
Xiaomi is very dedicated to their fanbase, and it is hard for us to believe that they would release a phone with these kind of issues – particularly the Pro version of a flagship. We do not know just how limited the scope of these incidents are, but to see such an awaited flagship be met with such controversy over what we can reasonably infer is the Snapdragon 810 is rather heatbreaking. But the most heartbreaking part about this is that many journalists are still afraid of pointing fingers at OEMs and Qualcomm. And while commercial devices do not show overheating per se, they suffer the constraints needed to reduce or eliminate it. There were overheating issues with the chipset, and there are still. The chinese giant itself had an administrator recognise these SD810 issues in a statement:
How do we work on the heating system of Mi Note pro, with a super slim body of 6.95 mm? To solve the heating issue of Snapdragon 810. Our engineers optimized the phone structure to dissipate the heat more evenly. Heat conductivity of CPU has been lifted and 4 graphite cooling fins are inserted inside, one of them being double-layered. Playing games for 20 minutes? The temperature on the back is 36.3℃, lower than that of human body. Xiaomi has applied for 5 heat conductivity patents.
So why are some sites like still referencing McDonough’s comments, and claiming that it might not be the actual Snapdragon 810’s physical construction that causes issues in both pre-release and commercial devices? They keep hinting that a software update will save the phone as seen in the M9 and G Flex 2, which made plenty of users feel like these two were unfinished phones. The fact that we are still talking about this problem 5 months and a half into 2015 and that the same problems still show up over and over while apologists deny it with arguments that can’t hold under scrutiny is rather embarrassing.
The Snapdragon 810 might have condemned an entire cycle of phones. HTC’s sales plummeted last month and analysts were quick to mention the Snapdragon 810 as a possible cause. It’s time to end unreasonable denial and apologia in the blogosphere, because it directly affects trusting consumers. Journalism must be skeptic, critical, and above all fair to everyone – especially the receivers. There is only one final thing to say here which I think summarizes some of the issues we see in this industry, and it does not come from any of us at XDA but from the acclaimed critical novelist and journalist George Orwell:
The post End of Denial: Yet Another SD810 Phone with Issues? appeared first on xda-developers.
from xda-developers http://ift.tt/1HlFwto
via IFTTT
from XDA http://ift.tt/1EMKysQ
via IFTTT
